Before I get into too many details, I'd like to wish my readers a belated Merry Humbug and a Happy Hangover Day. I hope your last week has been filled with joy, fellowship, and lots of 'walking through the winter, drink in hand'.
The pillaging of the tree this year wasn't quite the cache as it has been in years past, though all I really asked for was clothes. I did however, brave the lineup at Visions on Boxing Day, and walked out with a 40" Samsung LCD high-definition television. I'll be feeling the pinch of that purchase when my January credit card bill arrives.
It has somewhat been a bit of a yearly tradition here at mcfro.blogspot.com that I take a few minutes on the first day of the new year to reflect what I accomplished this year, and what I would expect in the next 52 weeks to come.
Sifting through this year's posts, I have come to the early conclusion that I really didn't accomplish anything, given the astounding few number of posts there have been. I mean, there were at least three months were I didn't blog at all. Like I have said on here ad nauseum, I have been busy -- I've been lazy too, lethargic, exhausted, and unmotivated. It's all derived from worker burnout, and is a big reason why my New Year's resolution is to find a healthier work/life balance. Money can buy lots of things; but it can't buy sleep.
2007 got off to a very expensive start, as I quickly dropped four digits into a newer, faster, and larger iMac, which has, more or less, become a machine I use for audio production. Since the successful resurrection of my derelict iBook, I spend most of my web-surfing time on it instead of the desktop machine. Sure it's not the fastest, but it's good enough for most mundane tasks, and even runs a number of video games quite nicely. The laptop also keeps me out of the windowless basement, which ensures that I see more sunlight -- indispensable for someone like me who goes through mood wings and bouts of depression.
2007 continued with a string of large purchases, as in April I added a third drumset to my arsenal. Price is relative: though I got a great deal on the kit, I still paid a pretty penny for it. I have subsequently spent small sums over the course of the year for replacement parts and upgrades. The Canwoods have also seen a number of gigs already, so they are paying for themselves -- if they haven't already.
An expensive set of concert tickets allowed me to see the Police in concert in Edmonton. After paying for fuel, meals, accommodations, and toys, the trip escalated well into four digits, but it was worth every penny to see Stewart, Sting, And Summers together for the first time in nearly 25 years.
June also saw the most successful blog post on this site, ever. Skeet from medhatblog.com kindly linked to me from the website. Though it didn't elicit comments as I had hoped, it did generate scores of traffic -- over tenfold what I was accustomed to. It even increased my readership -- albeit temporarily. Had I continued blogging regularly, I may have managed to keep those readers, but they have since gone.
I guess this was where I really got lazy. Now that I was generating a great deal more traffic than I had been, I also felt increasing pressure to be delivering work of exceptional quality in order to maintain that readership. That was, to say the least a little daunting. In one hand, the site was beginning to become what I had wanted it to become (popular!). On the other hand, I didn't have the energy to invest the time and effort required to make this site what it was becoming. So I sat on my haunches and meditated on what I wanted to do with this site. The next thing I knew, nearly four months had passed, with nary a post on this site, and all my readers found other weblogs to be entertained by. Thus, the answer became clear -- I'll just write about my insignificant little life whenever I am inspired, and if readership increases, great. If they do not, that's still great too.
The first entry since my 'hiatus', was a review of Matthew Good's performance at Medicine Hat College this November. The posting also generated a fair amount of interest from readers across Canada, including a few views from Mr. Good himself. He didn't drop a note, but he left a trail of bread crumbs that said he had been here.
Musically, 2007 has been a year of transition and flux. The Savoys took an extra long vacation this year, and by the time the band got back together to prepare for this year, it became clear that the band would be falling apart. We have best intentions to continue in 2008, and we are currently auditioning a replacement for BG, which we should know in a week if he is the right guy -- or not.
Tung 'N' Groove also got out of our heads and onto the stage. It took a great deal of rehearsing, and a large number of hefty equipment purchases, but we are now gigging regularly, and continue to build a dedicated following. We have secured a number of dates for 2008, which will be posted on the band's website when I have both time and motivation.
I hope everyone's 2008 is a prosperous one. See you (hopefully) soon.
Showing posts with label Gear. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gear. Show all posts
Tuesday, January 01, 2008
Tuesday, December 18, 2007
Tuning Lug Annoyances
Ed. Note: This is the fourth entry into the "Canwood Drum Restoration" thread that I began writing this past April. For those who are interested in reading the first three entries, you can view them here, here and here.An update to this project is long overdue, and my work is far from finished. But recall me saying that this would be a labor of love. It may take me a few more years to get the kit back to 100%, but it's the journey that most rewarding.
Of most importance, was getting the snare drum back into a condition where I could use it as a primary snare drum. It may be difficult to see from the pictures, but I measured the drum to be 4.5" deep by 14" diameter. I already had a Yamaha maple 4 x 14 drum in my arsenal, so I needed to find a a way to make this drum have a different character than the Yamaha.
The Canwood snare had been heavily used. A few of the tuning lugs were broken, the tuning hoops were rusting in areas, The snare throw-off was broken, and the snare wires were stretched. New snares and the throw-off were purchased in a local music store and fitted on the drum in a pinch, but some of the harder-to-find parts, such as the tuning lug swivel nuts wouldn't be found in my city.
Enter Drummaker.com. Searching through their vast inventory, I placed an order which included a pile of nylon lug washers, swivel nuts to refit every tuning lug on the snare, two "mighty-hoops" and a tube of machine thread grease, made by Loc-Tite. Now we are underway to do some serious restoration!
That's when I hit the first hurdle. It ended up that the swivel nuts I ordered did not fit my tuning lug casings (the ones I purchased were square; whereas mine were hexagon-shaped). That left me scouring eBay for the proper parts. I eventually found 2, and paid more in shipping than what I paid for the items -- go figure.
Once I had all the hardware off the snare drum, I again inspected the shell. The shell is quite round -- the drumheads spin freely on the drum, though there is a slight variance of about 1/16" in diameter. It's not severe, yet not perfect either. Now came the hard part: checking the trueness of the bearing edges. To do so, you need a perfectly flat surface. "One slab of marble, please."
This might have been the first time in my life that I wished I had a pool table in my house. My kitchen countertops are far from being perfectly flat. The closest thing I had was a mirror -- and I doubt a 16" X 24" mirror from Wal-Mart is perfectly flat.
But beggars can't be choosers, and a close approximation is better than none at all. So the mirror found a spot on the bedroom floor, the lights were turned off, the drum shell was placed on the mirror, and I shone a flashlight inside the shell.
Yup. Just what I had feared.
Over time, even the best-made drums can suffer from tortion. Poor tuning practices, transportation, changes in temperature and moisture can have an effect on the shape of the drum. Thus, the bearing edges are no longer true. The variation is very small -- 1/32" at the worst places, but in the world of drumming an untrue bearing edge can lead to nightmares. It is true that bearing edges can be re-cut, however the problem arises in finding a skilled craftsman whom you trust to perform such a delicate operation. One small mistake, and the drum is ruined. Alas, the bearing edges will have to wait. The snare was re-assembled using the new parts.
After a few gigs, I began to realize a mistake I had made during the first phase of restoration: Petroleum jelly.
AKA Vaseline. As it turns out, it is a fantastic lubricant. In fact, it's a little too good. There still needs to be a little bit of friction between the tuning lug and the swivel nut, for the drumhead to maintain pitch. What I found out, is that there was little to no friction at all, and my drums were detuning themselves at an alarming rate. It got so bad, that I was often tuning my drums twice a set (once every 5-6 songs). To compare, I was used to tuning my drums once per weekend.
So out came cleaning rags, and the Q-tips, and an afternoon was spent wiping each tuning lug free of vaseline. The Q-tips were run in and out of every swivel nut. I even tried placing a drop of the Loc-Tite machine thread grease on each lug. Then I found more problems.
A number of my tuning lugs were bent. They will undoubtedly need replacement. It appears another order to Drumbuilder.com will be placed in the near future. I reassembled the drums and gigged with them again.
Well the drums hold their pitch a little better, but they still detune more than they should. Maybe I'm just using a little too much grease. Wiping off any excess from the tuning lugs should allow them to behave they way they should.
From my standpoint, the upgrading of the drumset will continue in three phases. The first phase continues the hardware upgrade. This includes replacing bent tuning lugs, and installing nylon washers. All other tuning hoops should be inspected to see if they are flat. If not, they require replacement.
Phase two will include hiring a skilled craftsman to re-cut the bearing edges. This should eliminate most of the tuning issues I have with the drums.
Phase three is purely cosmetic; the drums are to be re-finished. A color is yet to be determined. This would also be the opportune time to replace the wooden hoops on the bass drum.
Thursday, December 13, 2007
The Cymbal Rant
Ok, I admit it... I am a cymbal purist. By that I mean I have very specific tastes when it comes to what I find desirable in the sound and appearance of a cymbal. I am so picky, in fact, that the smallest detail may be the determining factor in whether or not I spend my money on said cymbal.
To further elaborate, I prefer older cymbals to newer ones. There is something to be said about the mellower sound of a heavily-fingerprinted, nightclub-smoke- laced patina, with respect to a shiny, new cymbal. A cymbal ages, just as guitars do; to my ears they sound richer over time.
Then there's the bane of cymbal manufacture -- the 'brilliant' finish. From a marketing standpoint, I fully understand why manufacturers sell three times as many shiny pies as they do with dull pies. The cymbals are shinier, they appear to be easier to clean (just wipe the fingerprints off), and they look great under stage lighting. But I have never liked the sound of a cymbal in a brilliant finish. Not one. To me they sound shrill, un-musical; more like hunks of metal than an instrument.


I have even played the exact same cymbal in music stores -- the only difference being the type of finish on the cymbal, and always found myself gravitating towards the regular-finished cymbal in terms of preferring its' sound.
In my never-ending quest to find the 'perfect' cymbal, I find myself scouring auction sites, craigslists, and pawn brokers, hoping to find a used cache, instead of the virgin cymbals at the local music dealer. I have even resorted to paying more for a used cymbal than I would for
a new one -- so I wouldn't have to wait 10 years for the cymbal to age. Finding the perfect cymbal is a bit of a laborious process though that might mean I end up purchasing one cymbal for every 75 cymbals that have piqued my interest. If I preferred brilliant cymbals to traditional cymbals, I might have 100 cymbals in my collection, which would be, incidentally, quite a sizable investment.
I still buy the odd "new" cymbal in music stores. I sometimes find a new cymbal that speaks to me in such a way that I know it sounds good now -- and it will sound even better in the future. I just realize the sound that I hear in my head, cannot be purchased new. This sound only comes with an aged, thin cymbal that appears like the dog dragged it outside and buried it in the backyard.
Truth of the matter is, my cymbal purchases these days are more for the collectability value, than anything else. Rare cymbals, odd sizes, lines, makes and models that are no longer in production are the pies I seek. This also makes it difficult, as they are incidentally, the same cymbals that every other collector is searching for.
Still, when I see a cymbal close on an auction for a thousand dollars, I shake my head and wonder who'd be crazy enough to blow that kind of dough on a cymbal -- but the true cymbalholics do.
I'm just a cymbalholic in denial.
To further elaborate, I prefer older cymbals to newer ones. There is something to be said about the mellower sound of a heavily-fingerprinted, nightclub-smoke- laced patina, with respect to a shiny, new cymbal. A cymbal ages, just as guitars do; to my ears they sound richer over time.
Then there's the bane of cymbal manufacture -- the 'brilliant' finish. From a marketing standpoint, I fully understand why manufacturers sell three times as many shiny pies as they do with dull pies. The cymbals are shinier, they appear to be easier to clean (just wipe the fingerprints off), and they look great under stage lighting. But I have never liked the sound of a cymbal in a brilliant finish. Not one. To me they sound shrill, un-musical; more like hunks of metal than an instrument.


I have even played the exact same cymbal in music stores -- the only difference being the type of finish on the cymbal, and always found myself gravitating towards the regular-finished cymbal in terms of preferring its' sound.
In my never-ending quest to find the 'perfect' cymbal, I find myself scouring auction sites, craigslists, and pawn brokers, hoping to find a used cache, instead of the virgin cymbals at the local music dealer. I have even resorted to paying more for a used cymbal than I would for
a new one -- so I wouldn't have to wait 10 years for the cymbal to age. Finding the perfect cymbal is a bit of a laborious process though that might mean I end up purchasing one cymbal for every 75 cymbals that have piqued my interest. If I preferred brilliant cymbals to traditional cymbals, I might have 100 cymbals in my collection, which would be, incidentally, quite a sizable investment.
I still buy the odd "new" cymbal in music stores. I sometimes find a new cymbal that speaks to me in such a way that I know it sounds good now -- and it will sound even better in the future. I just realize the sound that I hear in my head, cannot be purchased new. This sound only comes with an aged, thin cymbal that appears like the dog dragged it outside and buried it in the backyard.
Truth of the matter is, my cymbal purchases these days are more for the collectability value, than anything else. Rare cymbals, odd sizes, lines, makes and models that are no longer in production are the pies I seek. This also makes it difficult, as they are incidentally, the same cymbals that every other collector is searching for.
Still, when I see a cymbal close on an auction for a thousand dollars, I shake my head and wonder who'd be crazy enough to blow that kind of dough on a cymbal -- but the true cymbalholics do.
I'm just a cymbalholic in denial.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
